2018专八作文范文 篇1

盲目跟随

People have different views on what children should do at a very early age. Some think that children should begin their formal education and start to spend most of their time on studies. Others believe that it is still time for young children to play. Both views are based on respective ground.

Those who argue for the playing time for children suggest that children at a very early age are still too young to focus their attention on learning. Their brain may not be ready for serious studies such as comprehension and memorizing learning materials. These people are partially right, for it is true that young children can hardly concentrate. Their attention on one thing lasts for no longer than 15 minutes or so. But we can arrange classes for shorter periods, can\'t we? And we can shift teaching subjects. Through putting them to study, young children are occupied with learning but not with playing.

Those who argue for children\'s early commencement for formal education believe that being put to studies, children can develop good habit of studying, for the process of learning helps develop children\'s mental abilities like the ability to memorize, the ability to understand and the ability to do simple calculation. Children\'s habit of studying and love for learning are of great importance to youngsters because these two things set up the sound foundation for their future studies.

Having children start formal education at a very early age benefits young children much more than simply letting them play most of their time. A good habit needs a long time to develop to become a second nature. More importantly, it is better to develop a good habit before a bad one may grow. Similarly, the love for learning should take toots for before the love for playing is established.

2018专八作文范文 篇2

The Relationship between Historical Grandet and the Future Greatness

Given to the humiliating history of last two centuries，Chinese people always make efforts to build a powerful the recent debate over the rise of China，some grass-root scholars argue that since China had achieved grandeur in ancient times， Chinese people are likely to lead the world logic seems plausible，but is there any causal relationship between historical grandeur and China’s future greatness?

Personally，I do not agree with this ，the argument assumes that they can predict the future by finding evidence in the course of mistake was criticized by Karl Popper in his influential book The Open Society and Its the book，he lenientlessly attacks ’historicism’，which means an approach to make historical predictions by discovering the patterns that underlie the evolutionof other words，precedent can not be used to explain what will happen in the China’s case，undoubtedly，it reached the historical peak in Tang that time，China was preponderant inthe world，for no countries could successfully challenge its consider the world situationat that world was separated by oceans，mountains，and deserts，for the communications means wereso retarded that China enjoyed a relatively safe environment except the threats from neighboring ，is it reasonable to predict that China’s greatness in the future is based on Tang Dynasty’s preponderance when the world is becoming smaller and more intermingled?

Secondly，indicative of finding evidence in the course of history is China’s current China has surpassed Germany as the third largest economy，its per capita income still ranks in the developingcountry is still a wide gap between China and the developed countries in terms of science and technology，education，military strength，and that China is still a developing country， it is understandable that we can gain inspiration from the historical grandeur，but we can not use it as evidence to support our goodwill. What matters a great China in the future is the efforts we are making atpresent.

In conclusion，we can see that there is no causal relationship between China’s grand history and its grandeur can only serve as inspiration to urge us to make more one proverb goes，many hands make light people will build a great nation in the future with combined efforts.

2018专八作文范文 篇3

Some Chinese top athletes including some world champions chose to pursue their career abroad after retiring from national teams. This has provoked quite some controversy. Some people have strong objections to the outflow of these players, believing it has minimized the advantages China has long had over foreign competitors. Others maintain that these individuals have right to choose their own way of life. Write an essay of about 400 words to express your view on this issue.

In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.

You should supply an appropriate title for your essay.

Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

Sample1

Serving Abroad: Better Not To Go

Nowadays some Chinese top athletes including some world champions have chosen to pursue their career abroad after retiring from national team. This has provoked quite a bit of controversy. Some people have strong objections to their behavior, which is believed to have harmed China’s advantages over foreign competitors. And others maintain that these people possess their own tree will about the decisions of future life. In my opinion, the disadvantages of these phenomena have outweighed the advantages.

First of all, the outflow of these outstanding athletes will directly lead to the loss of elites and techniques, which is very harmful for Chinese sports development. Coaches with ample and enviable experiences are valuable resources for our country. If we cannot keep them, their service for foreign teams will pose significant threats to us. The famous volleyball player and previous coach of our national team, Lang Ping is a good example in this sense. Around 1999, she left for Italy retirement, and got employed by one of the top clubs there. Since then the performance of that team soared up out of many experts’ expectation. In 2004 Olympic Games, another example can be found with the Australian volleyball team as a dark horse. The brilliant performance of the team was evidently attributable to the two former Chinese coaches.

Secondly, everyone should contribute to the prosperity of their home country and top athletes are no exceptions. It is true that they have devoted their childhood and youth to the tedious and strict training and cut-throat competition, yet it is equally true that the continuous development ot sports needs their rich experiences and hard-won skills. Thus there is no reason that they should leave aside the needs of our motherland and serve foreign countries.

Thirdly, as a side effect of economic development, more and more people have become money-oriented and self-centered. If these outstanding players just go abroad for the pursuit of money, a bad example might be set for younger athletes who lack experience and desire to succeed in the future. Without a reasonable appreciation for sports career, these young people could not live up to expectations of the nation and people and work for continued boom of the country’s sports. Under Chinese system, professional athletes are to a great extent supported by the state. Consequently the patrons are entitled to have a say for the beneficiary’s future p1an.

In conclusion, I am strongly against the phenomena of athletes’ outflow. To repay the cultivation and trust from our nation, they should devote themselves into training young athletes.

2018专八作文范文 篇4

Delivery Ability Matters or the Contents?

In college，it is claimed that students are given the right to select their courses in line with their personal ，in actuality，college students have to take some compulsory courses and some required selective those occasions，professors will find in their lectures students are absent-minded and hence interactions with students in class can not be easily people think that if professors are eloquent enough and have excellent delivery ability，their class will be students，the contents of professors’lectures seem less ，we can not simply assume that which one is more important than the should make specific analysis.

Firstly what matters is undoubtedly the contents for compulsory courses or selective courses，students are required to acquire basic knowledge or want to learn what interests them. It is ridiculousto suspect that professors are professors can stand in front of students and are givinglectures，they are experienced and know more than students after years of research and teaching. For college students，they are required to attentively listen to professors and take notes so that they this sense， when students are busy absorbing what professors are instructing in class，they will become less fussy about professors’delivery skills.

Secondly，for professors，it is their responsibility to have a full preparation for lectures and to deliver effectively the contents of their lectures to the contents can fulfill students’needs，excellent delivery skills will arouse students’interest and hold their attention for a long the fact that students can not select their favorite courses according to their own interests and preferences，professors should make more efforts to prepare for course，each professor has formed his own style after years of teaching. But students in different periods have different characters andneeds;professors can not simply apply their styles to all students. While students in the past might regard professors’ delivery style funny， current students are likely to dislike the style and consider it outdated and manipulative.

On all accounts， as we can reach different conclusion from different perspectives， we can not simply determine delivery ability mattersmore than the contents or vice interesting teaching styles andcontent-loaded contents make professors popular among students，college students should not forget that they are required to acquire knowledge in class.

2018专八作文范文 篇5

Students Should Be Required to Wear School Uniform

Of all the great changes that have taken place in the system of compulsory education, school uniform of diverse patterns has proved to be a success. Today, however, a controversy towards school uniform stretches widely as it is feared that such uniform somewhat diminishes the individual personality of students. My opinion is that it is worth the praise it has received.

In the first place, school uniform helps students foster team spirit and strengthen the spirit of cooperation. Providing a sense of unity, the uniform makes everyone feel that he or she is influential and indispensable in the team. Regardless of performance in class or examination, one student is wearing the same clothes as the others and working on his share for the team responsibility. Naturally they will be willing to participate in the team and proud of their contributions. Brought up in this caring and inclusive environment, students will have an easy time functioning in new community and collaborating with coworkers.

In the second place, school uniform reinforces the sense of equality for a diversified student body. School uniform tends to narrow down the discrepancy between students from families of low and high economic status. In this sense it may help lift some psychological obstacles. Owing to school uniform, the bias against poor students will disappear gradually. Had it not been for school uniform, wearing shabby clothes would be a constant reminder of poor family conditions. And what’s worse, they would feel ashamed of whom they are and the low self-esteem may have adverse impacts on study.

Last but not least, school uniform takes effect when accidents occur and the safety of students is endangered. The name or logo of school printed on uniform will help witness to know the victim’s identity and come to timely and efficient aid.

On the whole, students will benefit a great deal from their uniforms for the reasons ranging from their personality cultivation to aids in face of danger. Considering all above factors, it bears no reasoning to abandon school uniform.

2018专八作文范文 篇6

Traffic congestions are a headache in many cities across the country as a result of rapid increase of private cars. Therefore, some people suggest that a limit be put on the number of private cars. Do you agree or disagree with such a proposal? Write a composition of about 400 words on the following topic：

In the first part of your essay you should state clearly your main argument, and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or make a summary.

You should supply an appropriate title for your essay.

Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.

Should We Put a Limit on Private Cars?

Sample 1

A Limit Should Not Be Put on Private Cars

Owing to economic development and improvement in living standards of common people, more and more private cars are on road. Some believe private cars have brought convenience and mobility to the owners while others argue that private automobiles deserve a limit on the increasing number. As far as I see it, we should not put a limit on private cars.

First of all, the private car is a symbol of freedom and wealth. The private car has given us a freedom and convenience our ancestors could not dream of. We can travel to relatively remote places that it is hard to reach on foot or public transport rarely goes to. A car enables an individual or a family to travel at any time they wish. With a car there is no need to wait for the bus in the bitterly cold or under the scorching sun. Furthermore a car can serve as a symbol of one’s wealth, which makes him or her proud of his or her accomplishments and glorious past.

Secondly, a car can make our work more efficient and life more convenient. Nowadays many Chinese can enjoy the comfort and luxury of owning a private car. Having a car of one’s own means no more traveling to work on crowded buses or subway trains; no more waste of time for waiting at the bus stop or train station. With a car one does not have to worry about the possible danger their child suffers when they are elbowing their way through the crowd, instead they can drop off the children at school on the way to work. In the case of illness, the car takes its owner or other sick person to hospital without any delay.

Last but not least, lifting bans on private cars will stimulate the automobile industry, which provides jobs for a large team of workers. Known as a sunrise industry, Chinese automobile industry needs strong and continuous fueling from domestic demand. If more people buy cars, the industry will embrace continued growth, thus contributing more to the national economy. Moreover, its growth will trigger the boom of related industries like iron and steel production and energy.

In conclusion, the advantages of private cars convince us that we should not put a limit on the number of private cars. What we should do at the moment is to perfect the transport infrastructure to ensure private cars to go faster and more safely.